Why most of it never goes live
Classic RPA breaks the day a screen changes, and a script nobody documented becomes a risk the day its author leaves. Intelligent automation fails differently: an agent that improvises on an unusual case does damage confidently. Both problems have the same fix, an agent that is grounded in a recorded picture of the system it drives and that stops when the picture and the screen disagree.
The fix is the same five phase method behind every one of the twenty-seven systems on the work page: someone owns the outcome, the data is found, the definitions are agreed, the real process leaves a record, and only then does anything ship. The free AI readiness diagnostic tells you which phase you are in.
What we build for this
Operations agents behind gates
The agentic operations platform reconciles deposits and posts them to a ledger every single day. Every node that can move money sits behind a gate that fails closed, and the robot driving the vendor console is grounded in a stored atlas of that interface rather than guessing at the screen.
Requirements before automation
Every automation starts as a requirements graph whose leaves each name one function and one test. Nothing ships without an assertion that proves it. See requirements and specification.
Determinism where it matters
Steps that must produce the same answer twice are computed, not generated. Models describe, decide and draft; arithmetic, posting and filing are code with tests.
Runs on your side of the wall
A local model gateway serves models on hardware we own, so the automation does not depend on a third party API or send your operational data through one.
How it stays trustworthy
Grounded, trustworthy AI is not a slogan here. It is five rules every agent we ship has to pass.
The services behind it
From the seven AI consultancy services offered from Barcelona and Alanya, these are the ones this work draws on.
- AI readiness diagnostic and data roadmap
- Requirements and specification
- Production AI systems
- Data governance and data platforms
- AI governance and audit readiness
Questions people ask
Is this RPA?
It includes what RPA does, driving screens and moving records, but the driver is grounded in a recorded atlas of the interface and stops when the screen disagrees with it. And the decisions around the driving are made by agents that cite their inputs.
Which systems can it work with?
Anything with an API, a database, a mailbox or a screen. The deposit platform drives a vendor console that has no API at all.
How do you keep it from breaking silently?
Gates that fail closed, tests that assert the outcome of every step, and an evidence trail that a person reviews. Silence is treated as a failure, not a success.
Who maintains it after you leave?
It is built to survive that. Specification, tests and the evidence trail are the handover, and a fractional retainer is available if you want the architect on call.